The James Beveridge Media Research Centre at the
Jamia Millia Islamia University in
Delhi offered a summer course on "Film and the Historical Imagination",
conducted by Ranjani Mazumdar (an Associate Professor of Cinema Studies
at JNU). The course ran on alternate
working days for the two weeks between July 27–August 7, and comprised
five illustrated lectures followed by film screenings, with the sixth
morning reserved for a round-table discussion. Participants were charged
INR650 for admission.
Quoting from the invitation for applications:
Film is an archive of sensations, of emotions, of images and of
sounds. As a powerful recorder of life and its events, Film lends
itself to organizing not just historical knowledge but also commenting
on the nature of historical narration. This two week introductory
course on Film and the Historical Imagination will map the specific
ways in which history and ideas about the past get constructed through
the medium of cinema. Issues related to questions of evidence, memory,
historical catastrophe, nostalgia, myth and heritage will be discussed
and analyzed in relation to world cinema.
Hassath remembered attending and liking Ms. Mazumdar's lectures during a
film appreciation course at FTII
some years ago; this course sounded interesting too, and the schedule
and charges suited us perfectly (we would not have been able to attend
if either had been notably different). We applied for admission, and
were both accepted (to my considerable surprise, since the course was
advertised as being for "graduate students and media researchers").
This was an experimental, condensed version of a longer course taught at
JNU. The five lectures we had were The Historical Impulse in Film
(which discussed the way cinema has affected how we think about history,
and the creation of the "history effect" in cinema), Film Genre and
the Historical Imagination (about the context and development of the
Western and Musical genres), The Historical Event in Film and the
challenges involved in representing it, Film and the Historical
Biopic (about the factors influencing the selection of historical
characters about whom films are made), and Historical Imagination and
the Documentary Impulse (about the "liveness" of footage and the
ways in which documentaries differ from fiction).
It became obvious very quickly that Ranjani was an excellent teacher,
that she was deeply interested in the subject, and had prepared the
sessions carefully. I enjoyed all of her lectures thoroughly, but the
first and last had the highest concentration of ideas that were new to
me, so I found those the most interesting by far.
The first lecture on the "history effect" was very thought-provoking,
but I was disappointed that the discussion of techniques used to create
an impression of historicity was confined largely to matters of
superficial detail, and that the very different—and very powerful—ways
in which Tarkovsky (in Andrei Rublyov) and Bergman (in The
Seventh Seal) represented history were not mentioned (but I
understand that Ranjani does discuss them in her longer course). I was
also a little disappointed that the course focused mostly on films from
Hollywood (about which I know very little).
We were given a reader with two or three papers meant to set the context
for each day's discussions. Some of these were a pleasure to read (like
Edward Buscombe's introduction to the Western genre, about which I knew
very little), but I found many of them difficult to get through. In most
cases, the best I could do was to identify an occasional sentence or two
that made perfect sense, while the rest remained obscure. There wasn't
enough time in two weeks to cover so much material of such density in
sufficient detail.
(I'm being careful here not to dismiss the papers I found impenetrable
as being nonsense, even though the obscure prose was often annoying. In
fact, the bits I did understand made me want to read more; this
despite the frequent references to the work of familiar characters from
Intellectual
Impostures. But I'm not sure I would have made the effort without
the recommendation from Ranjani.)
Film screenings
We were particularly looking forward to the film screenings, even though
we didn't know in advance which films would be shown.
- The Battle of Algiers (Gillo Pontecorvo, 1966)
- Soldier Blue (Ralph Nelson, 1970)
- Missing (Costa Gavras, 1982)
- Rosa Luxemburg (Margarethe von Trotte, 1986)
- Chile: Obstinate Memory (Patricio Guzmán, 1997)
These films were selected only for their relevance to the subject of the
day's lecture (and selected very well, in that respect), but both The
Battle of Algiers and Chile: Obstinate Memory were brilliant
films in themselves, no matter how you looked at them. Missing
wasn't quite in the same league, but enjoyable nonetheless (it brought
to mind
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised).
I thought the post-screening discussions came too soon afterwards to be
useful. I would have liked to have more time to reflect on each film,
especially since I was watching them with an eye towards the points made
in class. I suspect there were others who felt the same way, and the
lecturer seemed a bit worried at how few people participated in these
discussions.
But then there were the people who felt compelled to say something after
every film, trying hard to sound profound and insightful. The worst of
them, whom we dubbed Mr. Voiceover, specialised in repeating—at great
length, in a slow drawl—what the lecturer had already said, with a
healthy dose of name-dropping sprinkled on. (I was amused to note that
he had his own little fan club, who hung on his every word and went so
far as to imitate his manner of speech.)
Administrivia: I was disappointed that a lot of time was lost every day
in fiddling with the audio-visual equipment. I would have thought a film
lab would have sorted out sound and video problems long ago, rather than
having to grapple with them every day. Likewise, I would have expected a
single switch to cut the lights in the room when a clip was being shown;
but instead, people seated near the corners of the room had to get up
and run to individual switchboards each time. But those are minor
quibbles about an otherwise brilliant course.
I enjoyed my first contact with academia, and I have a participation
certificate to show for it.